• "Something" arises in you, you wait a moment to experience essence Silence on the Subject, and move to a fresh new spot in your frontal lobes, nerve endings extending into fragrant atmospheres of bloodred hormonally-charged scents of electricblue awareness - fire-breathing lights of unknown and unknowable golden Tomorrows are yours

• Or "it" dies in it's tracks, footsteps in the sands of time, thought-threads a-warping and a-wefting, adrift in the infinite comment that is mind

"I swear to consider the following ideas of the PEP-Talk eList: in my quest to become a 'Walking Buddha', PEP-Talking his way into the minds and hearts of all those in the past, with talk from the future 'Walking Buddhas' of the day, enlightening all, as does shafts of light in a darkened cell.

• First story, That there is indeed, "information from the other side" which is distinct from the "noise on this side." There are four main parts to that sentence (information, other-side, noise, this-side): "information" is that which is 6d in origin - outside of time, from the future; "noise" is that which is 3d in result - sympathetic vibrations at this level, polarized in time, the "now" and "then".
• Second statement, That extraordinary information, distinct from noise, is unverbalized and must remain so - once information is verbalized, it enters/becomes noise, 3d speech.
  • Every poster admits publically and in advance that they've Sinned against the Vow of Silence.
  • Every Sinner admits publically and in advance that they are from the Future - speaking AS a Walking Buddha with no shame or guilt.
• Third dimension, That, therefore, all known verbal messages at this level is noise to you, including "Bibles", "Teachings", Science text books, all written media whatever the apparent source - man or beast - if you heard it, it's ordinary "noise" to you, and as you are you understand none of it.
  • Further, if the noise which is so easily accessible on this side, is all that "valuable", "useful", then people could read the texts, incorporate the "information", and successfully apply it, without it having to take decades or more to achieve the results suggested.
  • If you still believe the noise on this side is REALLY that useful to your Aim, and do not have an overpowering sense that "it all sounds the same", familiar - just NOISE - then this is certainly NOT the eList for you. If you have an inkling that with a source of New Information, you might have better results, then this eList might be for you.

• Fourth creation, "PEP-talk" is information from the other side, intentionally made just barely audible - as if forced to do so, from fear of non-existence - and that is it's primary purpose: to Verbalize that which has yet to be verbalized - that's the way the thing Speech grows - becoming conscious. "PEP-talk" is information, which does not come to you on a silver platter, but that you have to reach for, ask for, query - intentional investigations for a definite known purpose: existence. PEP-talk would be killed if made too verbal, too colloquial, to visible - and there are abundant killer-critics, including you, yourself. PEP-talk is straight talk as Seen from a 6d reality - some "marginal" attempts.
• Fifth and beyond, Sentences have no intrinsic value, or reality - being just sound/light waves; and it doesn't matter whose mouth/pen they come out of, once they enter your brain, and are converted to electrical energy, they have no intrinsic value. A Buddhist sentence is no different than a Christian or Jewish sentence. All sentences have zero intrinsic value - their only value is physical, existing only as vibration of the ambient material world, while flowing through a gooey-brain-matter flushed in neuropeptides, surging in hormones and chemicals pushed up the spinal cord and out to the ends of the nervous system. How efficiently you're able to use that vibration is entirely up to you - and your knowledge and capabilities.
• Sixth, Humans have no possible control over the creation of sentences, nor the sympathetic vibration in the receiver - mind, mind only - until they do, until they can access extraordinary information for themselves, available above the noise.
• Seventh, "PEP-talk" does not exist in Life, not the Life you know. It certainly does not exist on Yahoo eLists - except, MAYBE, this one, MAYBE. If something you would care to write could be submitted to one of your other many eLists, it most likely would not be appropriate here, and will likely be "moderated" into the bit-bucket.
  • "PEP-talks" are road maps, to navigate your own brain, not someone else's. Realize, you're not trying to give yourself or others a "pep-talk" (in the pop-psychology sense), to get yourself or others into the mood to discover and submit new information. Besides, anyone can do that, that's what all ordinary conversation is, even on these "lofty" matters - giving each other a comforting pep-talk, just a little entertaining non-sense to wile away the hours.
  • A "PEP-talk" is, itself, the new information, and it's always demanding, almost never comforting - and it's given as a heightened form of "New Info-tainment", in the sense that, while being New and Demanding, it is ALSO entertaining.
  • Some people have never given a "PEP-talk", in their entire lives. And, the closest they've come to it, is reading/rewriting someone else's material (however mangled their rendition) - and, since the sentences course through their own neural pathways, they get a little, transient, satisfactory spike of excitement up there, "as though" they created it, but of course they did not, and per force, that spike is minimal compared to the experience of actually creating an original PEP-talk.

• Eighth, No use of self-reference is permitted; no "I think this", nor "I feel that", nor "I believe the other". Simply, Plainly, state what you're motivated to make audible/readable, and know in advance that it Stands on its own - requiring no reply, no comment either way. Your entire "satisfaction" should be in the conscious production of a valid PEP-talk. Also, No use of other-reference is permitted - that is, no reference to other people, their writings, their critics writings, and no quotations of any kind - EXCEPT interesting music lyrics, if woven into something worth posting.
• Ninth, To join PEP-talk, you have to contribute a PEP-talk - to Sin against this Vow. To contribute, you have to submit to this Vow of Silence. Remember, it's not that you would join this list so that you can read and comment upon the contributions of others; it's so that you can discover and contribute your own. Think of it this way - we're not here to entertain you, you're here to entertain us.
• Last, The author must not be credited. You're not here to "make a name for yourself", so make one up and use it. Further, this Vow must not be remembered or referred to again (except, perhaps, "Silence!"). You're not here to "teach the vows" or "scold the sinner", so read it, learn it, incorporate it.